Turner v. Turner’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
1 district · 13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently January 2025
1 district · 13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Idaho ex rel. Evans v. Oregon · 115 Cal. App. 2d 684 - Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission · Cruise v. City & County of San Francisco · Carruth v. Fritch · 156 Cal. App. 2d 382 - Regus v. Schartkoff
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he mere pendency of negotiations during the period of a statute of limitations, which are conducted in good faith with a view to ultimate compromise, is not of itself sufficient to establish an estoppel.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[w]hile a finding of equitable estoppel which would prevent resort to a statute of limitations will, in most cases, involve questions of fact, it is apparent that in certain cases this determination will become a matter for the courts. This is particularly true when there is no promise of settlement, or where there is conduct not ostensibly relied on.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[a] potential defendant has no duty to remind a claimant that the statute of limitations is running”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.