Thomsen v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
October 1999
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Schneble v. Florida · Shapard v. State · United States v. Jobe · 156 F. Supp. 495 - United States v. Hoffa · Sam v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This Court has held previously that a change of venue on the ground that a fair trial cannot be had in the district where the actions is pending is warranted only where it is shown that the inhabitants of the district are so prejudiced that a fair and impartial trial for the defendant in that district would be impossible.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Brown v. State“is merely a procedural statement of disposition subsequent to the verdict and is immaterial to the process of rendering a verdict concerning the sanity of the accused.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ellis v. State“impossible to empanel a jury which did not have a fixed opinion concerning this case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Brown v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.