Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

582 So. 2d 168

Cameron v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1991-07-10

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 1992

4 state decisions

Relies on Thomas v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1991-07-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

SHIVERS, Chief Judge.

¶1Appellant, Billy Hernandez Cameron, appeals the trial court’s summary denial of his Rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief, in which he raised three grounds: (1) that his guilty plea was involuntarily entered; (2) that his habitual offender sentence was illegal because the trial court failed to follow the procedural safeguards set out in section 775.084, Florida Statutes; and (3) that he was denied effective assistance of counsel. We affirm the trial court’s denial of grounds 1 and 3, since the written plea of guilty and negotiated sentence, signed by the appellant and attached to the trial court’s order, negates both of *169those grounds by containing statements that defendant was satisfied with his attorney, that all aspects of the plea were fully explained to his complete satisfaction, and that the plea was freely and voluntarily entered. Thomas v. State, 419 So.2d 1141 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). We reverse the denial of ground 2, however, and remand for the trial court to either attach portions of the record and file conclusively showing that the appellant is entitled to no relief, or to take such further action as is required by Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

¶2AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED and REMANDED.

SMITH and JOANOS, JJ., concur.
/582/so2d/168 · .json · Public domain