Redmond v. McCool’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently September 2017
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 390 So. 2d 196 - Cangelosi v. SCHWEGMANN BROS., ETC. · Harper v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. · 368 So. 2d 181 - Trahan v. Ritterman · Elmer v. Coplin · Lemeshewsky v. Dumaine
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) in good faith, (2) on a matter in which the person making the communication has an interest or with regard to which he has a duty, or (3) to a person with a corresponding interest or duty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Only when a statement is found to be made without reasonable grounds for believing it to be true can the person uttering the statement be found to be actuated by malice or ill will.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Costello v. Hardy
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.