Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 582 So. 2d 285 - State v. Gordon

582 So. 2d 285 - State v. Gordon’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
February 2012
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently February 2012 · most notably 694 So. 2d 440 - State v. Jackson (1997), 82 So. 3d 1232 - State v. Brown (2012)

27 state decisions

180199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Manson v. Brathwaite · State v. Sepulvado · 523 So. 2d 1305 - State v. Mussall · 459 So. 2d 31 - State v. Richardson · Anderson v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Armed robbery is the taking of anything of value belonging to another from the person of another or that is in the immediate control of another, by use of force or intimidation, while armed with a dangerous weapon.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In any event, the defendant's own testimony at the trial for the instant offenses established both the prior felony conviction for simple robbery in 1987 and his identity as this prior convicted felon. During the trial, the defendant admitted his prior felony conviction for simple robbery in 1987 and also admitted that he was on parole for this conviction when he committed the instant offenses. The State requested that the trial court take judicial notice of the trial for the instant offenses and the defendant's testimony therein, which the trial court did. Accordingly, we conclude that the trial court properly adjudicated the defendant to be a second felony habitual offender.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.