Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 582 So. 2d 581 - Fortner v. State

582 So. 2d 581 - Fortner v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
July 2011
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently July 2011

23 state decisions

160199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ohio v. Roberts · California v. Green · Idaho v. Wright · Maryland v. Craig · Lord Electric Co. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Reliability can be inferred without more in a case where the evidence falls within a firmly rooted hearsay exception. In other cases, the evidence must be excluded, at least absent a showing of particularized guarantees of trustworthiness.'”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The child's out-of-court statement is shown to the reasonable satisfaction of the court to possess particularized guarantees of trustworthiness.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “. . . because a lengthy hearing was held on the admissibility of the out-of-court statements before they were offered, because it appears that defense counsel was sufficiently prepared to oppose the admission of the statements, and because counsel did, in fact, file a written motion to suppress the statements before they were introduced into evidence, we find the defendant had notice adequate to allow him 'a fair opportunity to prepare a response to the statement[s].'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.