¶1ON MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
¶2Motion for rehearing en banc denied.
¶3SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART, NESBITT, FERGUSON, JORGENSON, COPE, LEVY, GERSTEN and GODERICH, JJ., concur.
582 So. 2d 643
Nateman v. Greenbaum
Decided April 16, 1991
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently January 2015
3 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1991-04-16
View the full empirical analysis of this case →