Martin v. Martin’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently July 2010
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris · 442 So. 2d 203 - Kuvin v. Kuvin · 453 So. 2d 1355 - US Fidelity & Guar. Co. v. Dept. of Ins. · 432 So. 2d 666 - Campbell v. Campbell · Vernell v. Edge, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]here is no support in law or logic for such an award as rehabilitative alimony.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“If such were permitted then one can imagine no bounds to the limits how far does one go before the storm is weathered or the gap is bridged?”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Price v. Price“redevelopment of previous skills or provision of the training necessary to develop potential supportive skills.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.