582 So. 2d 926 - Johnson v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Arceneaux v. Domingue · 358 So. 2d 919 - Sims v. Sims · 332 So. 2d 834 - TL James & Co., Inc. v. Montgomery · 283 So. 2d 226 - Bernhardt v. Bernhardt · 452 So. 2d 1161 - Succession of Lyons
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As stated by the court in Lachney , inquiry must be made to determine whether the disability benefits represent deferred compensation in the nature of retirement or pension income or compensation to an injured employee for lost earnings in the event the employee becomes incapacitated due to serious illness or injury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“thus, while it was conclusive in Lachney that the benefits were true disability payments, the evidence in the instant case is overwhelming that Mr. Johnson's benefits.... were retirement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Brant v. Brant
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.