Maloy v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently July 2012 · most notably Dowthitt v. State (1996), Boyd v. State (1991)
29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Alejandro v. State · Myre v. State · Tarpley v. State · Cain v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We hold Art. 14.04, (V.A.C.C.P.), does not require a showing that the offender in fact was about to escape, nor does it require a showing that there in fact was no time to procure a warrant. The statute merely requires a showing that the officer was acting upon satisfactory proof from representations by a credible person that the felony offender ‘is about to escape, so that there is no time to procure a warrant.’ ” P. 476.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Hogan v. State · Fry v. State“name and address and told them that he was about to `bug out' or flee the city soon.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Fry v. State“the testimony is undisputed that there was no magistrate available at that hour.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Fry v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.