In re Williams’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 1326 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 151 (Bankruptcy Amendments) · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on In Re DeSardi · In Re Erwin · Royals v. Massey (In Re Denton) · Wells Fargo Financial Georgia, Inc. v. Baxter (In Re Williams) · In Re Hill
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“can find no support for the holding ... that the term 'equal monthly amounts' in § 1325(a)(5)(B)(iii) references payments to the trustee, as opposed to a creditor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Miceli“there is no basis in the statute for finding that § 1326(b)(1) trumps the right of an objecting secured creditor to equal payments under § 1325(a)(5)(B).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Miceli“subsections I and II of § 1325(a)(5)(B)(iii) are joined by 'and,' which indicates both provisions must be satisfied”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Miceli
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.