Whitehead v. Strauss’s Empirical Analysis
583 F.2d 1104 · 1978
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 2008
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pepper v. Litton · Lascaris v. Shirley · Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Starley · Offer v. Superior Court · 231 Cal. App. 2d 124 - Mills v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is addressed to the sound discretion of the Bankruptcy Court, and the scope of review is accordingly limited to a determination of whether there was an abuse thereof.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“this request [to file a new petition] comes too late. Her discharge was granted . . . . If her case were dismissed and she were permitted to file, she would, in effect, be receiving the benefit of two discharges in bankruptcy within less than the statutory six year period.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Blue
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.