Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 583 F.2d 1179 - United States v. Ritch

United States v. Ritch’s Empirical Analysis

583 F.2d 1179 · 1978

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
7
states following
January 2008
most recently cited

31 federal appellate · 4 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently January 2008 · most notably United States v. Cresta (1987), United States v. Aulet (1980)

31 federal appellate · 4 district · 12 state decisions

3501978198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3150 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Starnes v. Penrod Drilling Co. · Cree v. Goldstein · Time, Inc. v. Bon Air Hotel, Inc. · Drew v. United States · Shoup Voting Machine Corp. v. Datamedia Computer Service, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is well established that a charge of bail jumping or escape may be deemed sufficiently “connected” with a substantive offense to permit a single trial, at least where the charges are related in time, the motive for flight was avoidance of prosecution, and appellant’s custody stemmed directly from the substantive charges.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The simple answer to [appellant’s claim that joinder of bail jumping and cocaine charges was improper because those offenses are not of a similar character] is that the scope of [the rule] is broader. It also permits joinder where the offenses are “connected together.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.