Connally v. Lines’s Empirical Analysis
583 F.2d 199 · 1978
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently July 2014
13 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United States · Vaca v. Sipes · Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc. · Ford Motor Co v. Huffman International Union United Automobile Aircraft and Agricultural Implementworkers of America Ci
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if the conclusions of the trial judge may reasonably be inferred from the record, such conclusions will not be disturbed on appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“his [the arbitrator's] decision shall be final and binding on both parties,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“is somewhat modified where there is little or no 'live' testimony”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.