National Labor Relations Board v. Sure-Tan, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
583 F.2d 355 · 1978
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2002
13 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 152 (§ 2 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 159 (§ 9 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Mathews v. Diaz · Brooks v. National Labor Relations Board · Leonor Alberti Decanas and Miguel Canas,s, v. Anthony G. Bica and Juan Silva. · McCulloch v. Sociedad Nacional De Marineros De Honduras
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“will not adversely affect the wages and working conditions of the workers in the United States similarly employed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.