Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 583 F.2d 373 - Heilman v. Bell

Heilman v. Bell’s Empirical Analysis

583 F.2d 373 · 1978

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
October 1984
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Starnes v. Penrod Drilling Co. · Eisenstadt v. Baker · Ristaino v. Ross · United States v. Southwestern Cable Co. · Goldstein v. California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “criminal charges under 17 U.S.C. §§ 101(e) and 104 may (as here) be brought against tape duplicators who have attempted to comply with § 1(e).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.