Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 583 F.2d 515 - Berrier v. Egeler

Berrier v. Egeler’s Empirical Analysis

583 F.2d 515 · 1978

Citation profile

66
cited by 66 later decisions
3
states following
June 2012
most recently cited

35 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently June 2012 · most notably Walker v. Engle (1983), United States v. Mentz (1988)

35 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

48019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Wainwright v. Sykes · Fay v. Noia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “we find no bar to habeas relief in this case because (petitioner's) trial counsel made no objection . . . at the time of trial. The magnitude of the error in this trial would make it cognizable in a habeas proceeding as plain error even where no objection had been made before the trial court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. ““You are to determine from all of the evidence whether facts constituting such reasonable cause have been established and unless such facts constituting such reasonable cause have been established by the defense in this case you cannot acquit on the ground of self-defense....””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““The defendant is not required to prove that he acted in self-defense. The prosecution has the burden of proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, and this includes the responsibility of proving that the defendant was not acting in self-defense.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.