Brasea Inc Williams’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently August 2003
1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · Kaspar Wire Works, Inc. v. Leco Engineering & Machine, Inc. · Farrell Lines Inc. v. Jones · Williams v. Brasea, Inc. · Empire Seafoods, Inc., Appellant-Appellee v. Carl R. Anderson, Appellees-Appellants. Carl R. Anderson and Gerritt A. Gates, Appellants-Appellees v. Empire Seafoods, Inc., Appellee-Appellant. Cleary Bros. Construction Company, Appellant-Appellee v. Empire Seafoods, Inc., Appellees-Appellants
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We cannot agree. In ascertaining whether a shipowner is entitled to limitation, the Court must first determine which act or acts of negligence or conditions of unseaworthiness caused the injury. The Court then determines whether the shipowner had knowledge or privity of these specific acts or conditions. Farrell Lines, Inc. v. Jones, 530 F.2d 7 (5th Cir.1976). ( 583 F.2d at 738 )”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.