United States v. Conner’s Empirical Analysis
583 F.3d 1011 · 2009
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently January 2021 · most notably State v. Kitchens (2011), United States v. Green (2010)
24 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kimbrough v. United States · Old Chief v. United States · Michelson v. United States · Medellin v. Texas · United States v. Paladino
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the evidence is directed toward establishing a matter in issue other than the defendant’s propensity to commit the crime charged; (2) the evidence shows that the other act is similar enough and close enough in time to be relevant to the matter in issue; (3) the evidence is sufficient to support a jury finding that the defendant committed the similar act; and (4) the evidence has probative value that is not substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[the defendant] did not merely fail to object to the court's instruction regarding aiding and abetting. During the charging conference, [defense] counsel expressly stated that she preferred [the later challenged] aiding and abetting instruction over the alternative. At no time in this discussion did she indicate that she objected to instructing the jury on aiding and abetting at all.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Kitchens
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.