Pedroza v. BRB’s Empirical Analysis
583 F.3d 1139 · 2009
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 33 U.S.C. § 901 · 33 U.S.C. § 902 · 33 U.S.C. § 903 · 33 U.S.C. § 921
Relies on Northeast Marine Terminal Co. v. Caputo · United States v. Craft · Morrison-Knudsen Construction Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs · Nogueira v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad · U. S. Industries/Federal Sheet Metal, Inc. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an injury which is solely mental and is based on work-related stress if such mental injury is a direct consequence of a lawful personnel decision involving a disciplinary action, work evaluation, job transfer, demotion or termination taken in good faith by the employer.” See Gamble v. New York State Narcotics Control Comm’n, 60 A.D.2d 703 , 400 N.Y.S.2d 599 (N.Y.App.Div.1977). In Oregon, the legislature in 1998 added a provision that barred compensation for mental disorders unless it is a product of”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Pedroza v. BRB“establish a new and higher threshold of compensability for psychiatric injury.” See also Cal. Labor Code § 3208.3 (c) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Pedroza v. BRB
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.