Rhode v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
583 F.3d 1289 · 2009
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2422 (White-Slave Traffic Act of 1910 (Mann Act)) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Danforth v. Minnesota · Tannenbaum v. United States · Murray v. United States · Clisby v. Jones · Lynn v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“deep concern over the piecemeal litigation of federal habeas petitions filed by state prisoners”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.