United States v. Fox

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Sept. 16, 2009.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2009-09-16

Cited by 2 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2011

1 federal appellate ·

3 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2009-09-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Stephan Alexander Collins, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Anchorage, AK, Kirby A. Heller, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

¶2John Michael Fox, Yazoo City, MS, pro se.

¶3Mary C. Geddes, Esquire, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Kevin Francis McCoy, Esquire, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Anchorage, AK, for Defendanb-Appellee.

¶4ORDER

¶5KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

¶6Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be heard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.

Download

Copy

Embed on your site

Hover to preview · click to copy the code

Search Wikipedia →

Status

Reviewed by Fox v. United States · Supreme Court of the United States

Court

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Counsel

Stephan Alexander Collins, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Anchorage, AK, Kirby A. Heller, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

John Michael Fox, Yazoo City, MS, pro se.

Mary C. Geddes, Esquire, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Kevin Francis McCoy, Esquire, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Anchorage, AK, for Defendanb-Appellee.