Rempfer v. Sharfstein’s Empirical Analysis
583 F.3d 860 · 2009
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 29 district ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1107 · 21 U.S.C. § 355 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 5 U.S.C. § 553 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. · Fw/pbs Inc II v. City of Dallas Mjr Inc · Marshall County Health Care Authority v. Shalala
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“actually presents no factual allegations, but rather only arguments about the legal conclusion to be drawn about the agency action.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“is based on the agency record and limited to determining whether the agency acted arbitrarily or capriciously.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'When a party seeks review of agency action under the APA before a district court, the district judge sits as an appellate tribunal.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. S.A. v. Trump
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.