Gunville v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis
583 F.3d 979 · 2009
Citation profile
23 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Branti v. Finkel · Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc. · Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois · Bombard v. Fort Wayne Newspapers, Inc. · Haywood v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 97 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A court may consider only admissible evidence in assessing a motion for summary judgment.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Until the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Gross v. FBL Financial Sews., Inc., --- U.S. —, 129 S.Ct. 2343 , 174 L.Ed.2d 119 (2009), plaintiffs could prevail in a First Amendment § 1983 action if they could demonstrate that their speech was a motivating factor in the defendant’s decision. After Gross , plaintiffs in federal suits must demonstrate but-for causation unless a statute (such as the Civil Rights Act of 1991) provides otherwise.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“A party may not rely upon inadmissible hearsay to oppose a motion for summary judgment.”). Regarding the former, Plaintiff’s grievances constitute records of regularly conducted activity under Federal Rule of Evidence 803(6). To be admissible as a business record,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Birdo v. Gomez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.