Walsh v. Chez’s Empirical Analysis
583 F.3d 990 · 2009
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Van Dusen v. Barrack · Romero v. Drummond Co. · 191 Ill. App. 3d 828 - Diggs v. Suburban Medical Center · Massey v. United States · 319 Ill. App. 3d 308 - Simmons v. Garces
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is not to replicate every word that the expert might say on the stand. It is instead to convey the substance of the expert's opinion ... so that the opponent will be ready to rebut, to cross-examine, and to offer a competing expert if necessary.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.