Fannon v. Guidant Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
583 F.3d 995 · 2009
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78U (§ 21d of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd. · Eminence Capital, LLC v. Aspeon, Inc. · Hecker v. Deere & Co. · Pugh v. Tribune Co. · Belizan Pc v. Hershon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“plaintiff[ ] had, as a practical matter, a number of opportunities to craft a complaint that complied with the standards of the PSLRA[,]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“each case must be evaluated on its own merit, in light of its own procedural history.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“it is clear ... that the complaint could not be saved by amendment[,]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.