McKenzie v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently July 2024
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pointer v. Texas · Bracy v. Gramley · Marshall v. Jerrico, Inc. · Miller v. Gentry · O'Connell v. Manning
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“McKenzie has not cited any authority for the proposition that a judge may not discuss potential issues with a judicial colleague in the absence of the parties. We believe it is inherently a judge’s role to assist colleagues in performing their adjudicative responsibilities.... Our system of justice would suffer greatly if judges could not discuss cases with, solicit input from, and benefit from each other’s richly varied experiences.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cannon v. State“address them in the argument portion of his brief” constituted waiver); State v. Grecinger, 569 N.W.2d 189 , 193 n. 8 (Minn.1997) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Brocks v. State“actual bias against the defendant or interest in the outcome of his particular case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Mouelle
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.