Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 583 P.2d 196 - Randall v. State

Randall v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
3
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently August 2019

12 state decisions

6019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Tocco v. United States · Cupp v. Naughten · 1 Cal. 3d 41 - People v. Tijerina · 48 Ala. App. 726 - Eady v. State · Pulakis v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An appellant raising an error as plain error on appeal “must shoulder the heavy burden of demonstrating that the alleged misconduct raises a substantial and important question.” Garroutte v. State, 508 P.2d 1190, 1191 (Alaska 1973). Furthermore, such error must be “obviously prejudicial.” Bowker v. State, 373 P.2d 500, 505 (Alaska 1962); Kugzruk v. State, 436 P.2d 962, 964 (Alaska 1968). “Where the misconduct fails to rise to the level of plain error, considerations of judicial economy dictate that we deal with the matter summarily.” Garroutte v. State, supra, at 1191.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The general rule is that any criminal offense or element of an offense may be established by circumstantial evidence unless there is an express requirement to the contrary. 1 C. Torcia, Wharton’s Criminal Evidence § 6, at 4-5 (13th ed. 1972). Randall v. State, 583 P.2d 196, 198 (Alaska 1978) (footnote omitted).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.