Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 583 SO2D 1005 - Bedell v. Bedell

Bedell v. Bedell’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
3
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably 97 Md. App. 689 - Blaine v. Blaine (1993), 616 So. 2d 436 - Miller v. Schou (1993)

33 state decisions

180199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris · 476 So. 2d 671 - Marquez v. State · 482 So. 2d 346 - Wade v. State · Alexander v. Martin · 459 So. 2d 1037 - Protective Cas. Ins. Co. v. Killane

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “For the purpose of demonstrating need in dissolution or modification proceedings, the fact that one of the parties is surviving through the largess of her family is legally irrelevant.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the relatively rare ease where the recipient spouse’s needs, as established by the standard of living maintained during the marriage, were not, and could not be initially met by the original final judgment of marriage dissolution due to the then-existing financial inability of the paying spouse to meet those needs, which needs continue to remain unmet at the time of modification.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[The former wife] testified that because the cost of living had gone up since the divorce, her standard of living had gone down. Her major appliances, such as the dishwasher, the trash compactor, and the dryer, need to be replaced because the original items are now over fifteen years old. The carpet in the townhouse is worn out and the plumbing is in need of repair. She puts bed sheets over the windows at night because of the absence of drapes. She does not use the air conditioner because she cannot afford the high electric bills. She needs more money for food and clothing. She drives a [nine-year-old] 1982 automobile that keeps breaking down.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.