Thomas v. Clairol Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2007
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Bloxom v. Bloxom · Walker v. Maybelline Co. · Cell-O-Mar, Inc. v. Gros · 571 So. 2d 866 - Leday v. Clairol, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“failed to use reasonable care to provide and adequate warning of such characteristic and its dangers to users and handlers of the product.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“possessed a characteristic that may cause damage at the time it left its manufacturer's control”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“should be conducted before applying the dye. The directions for the allergy test were”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.