Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

583 So. 2d 1340

Reynolds v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 26, 1991

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1991-07-26

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1991

1 state decisions

Relies on Horsley v. Horsley · Ex Parte Cason

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1991-07-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

HORNSBY, Chief Justice.

¶1The petition for writ of certiorari is denied. With an unpublished memorandum opinion, the Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the trial court’s judgment on the grounds that Samuel Reynolds had “waived the issue of the alleged improper venue by pleading guilty after his motion to dismiss [the indictment against him] had been denied.” In denying the petition for writ of certiorari, this Court should not be understood as approving this statement in the Court of Criminal Appeals’ unpublished memorandum opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973). This Court’s denial of certiorari review is not an expression of its opinion on the merits of a case. Ex parte Cason, 515 So.2d 725 (Ala.1987).

¶2WRIT DENIED.

MADDOX, HOUSTON, KENNEDY and INGRAM, JJ., concur.
/583/so2d/1340 · .json · Public domain