Patterson v. Meyers’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 549 So. 2d 840 - Rosell v. Esco · Middle Tennessee Council, Inc. v. Ford · 520 So. 2d 475 - Quarles Drilling v. General Acc. Ins. Co. · 493 So. 2d 881 - Johnson v. Masur · Baham v. Patterson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The weight to be given to an expert's testimony is largely dependent on his qualifications and the facts on which his opinion is based. * * * An expert's opinion has no value if the facts on which it is predicated are not substantiated by the record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.