Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
November 2009
most recently cited
27 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Sorrells v. United States · Kahn v. Grant · In re Martin-Trigona · Corallo v. United States · Pierce v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'that the government's conduct created a substantial risk that the offense would be committed by a person other than one ready to commit it.' " Smith , 583 So.2d at 992 (quoting United States v. Dickens , 524 F.2d 441 , 444 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 994 , 96 S.Ct. 2208 , 48 L.Ed.2d 819 (1976)). Generally, in cases involving a "reverse buy,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The first inquiry is whether or not the offense was induced by the government agent; and the second is whether or not the defendant was predisposed to commit the type of offense charged.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Davis v. State , 570 So.2d 791 (Ala.Cr.App. 1990).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.