Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 583 SW2D 531 - State v. Reed

State v. Reed’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
December 1995
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently December 1995 · most notably State v. Parkus (1988), State v. Johnson (1985)

30 state decisions

260197919801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Degraffenreid · State v. Hutchinson · State v. Shuls · State v. Stuart · State v. Hayzlett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Mr. Lindsey doesn’t have to go forward with any evidence if he doesn’t wish to. He doesn’t have to take the stand if he doesn’t want to — _””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “References to the accused’s failure to testify, however, which were not objected to at trial or alleged as error in a motion for new trial have been regarded as justifying the invocation of the plain error rule when such references deprived the accused of his right to a fair trial. We are of the opinion that the prosecutor’s remarks infringed upon the appellant’s right against self-incrimination, and warrant our review pursuant to the plain error doctrine....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““The Missouri Constitution, Article I, § 19, provides, in part, ‘That no person shall be compelled to testify against himself in a criminal cause, ... ’ This constitutional provision prohibits direct or indirect comments on the failure of a defendant to testify.” (Our emphasis.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.