Artis v. District of Columbia’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 7 district · 21 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1691E · 21 U.S.C. § 1604 · 22 U.S.C. § 1631K · 26 U.S.C. § 6213 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 28 U.S.C. § 1391 · 28 U.S.C. § 2415 (Indian Claims Limitation Act of 1982)
Relies on Carnegie-Mellon University v. Cohill · Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Enrico St Cyr · M'Culloch v. State of Maryland · American Pipe & Construction Co. v. Utah · Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. Tomanio
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he period of limitations for any claim asserted under subsection (a), and for any other claim in the same action that is voluntarily dismissed at the same time as or after the dismissal of the claim under subsection (a), shall be tolled while the claim is pending and for a period of 30 days after it is dismissed unless State law provides for a longer tolling period.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“When district courts dismiss all claims independently qualifying for the exercise of federal jurisdiction, they ordinarily dismiss as well all related state claims.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“dismissed all claims over which it has original jurisdiction.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.