Slaieh v. Simons’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 323 · 11 U.S.C. § 363 · 11 U.S.C. § 549 · 11 U.S.C. § 704 · 28 U.S.C. § 158
Relies on Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Warth v. Seldin · Foman v. Davis · Linda R. S. v. Richard D. · 20 Cal. 4th 163 - Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[E]ven if Trustee owed [the debtor] a fiduciary duty in this case, it was as to his interest in surplus estate property, not as to personal property abandoned following eviction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Christensen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.