Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 584 BR 696 - In re Joseph

In re Joseph’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
May 2019
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 105 · 11 U.S.C. § 524 · 11 U.S.C. § 727

Relies on Hanson v. Denckla · Johnson v. Home State Bank · Pertuso v. Ford Motor Credit Co. · Ralph M. Cox, on Behalf of Himself v. Zale Delaware, Inc. · SEC v. Dahlstrom

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Section 524(c) does not specifically authorize monetary relief for a violation of the discharge injunction, but courts may award actual damages based on their inherent contempt power.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A court may also award 'mild non-compensatory punitive damages' as necessary to enforce the Bankruptcy Code,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The discharge injunction promotes the fresh start policy of the Bankruptcy Code.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.