United States v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
584 F.2d 148 · 1978
Citation profile
80 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 120 later decisions — most recently May 2015 · most notably McQueen v. Scroggy (1996), United States v. Vaccaro (1987)
80 federal appellate · 14 state decisions — followed in 11 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3006A (Criminal Justice Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Irvin v. Dowd · Swain v. State of Alabama · Bounds v. Smith · Sheppard v. Maxwell · Arizona v. Washington
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 120 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'the juror can lay aside his impression or opinion and render a verdict based on the evidence presented in court.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“It is the responsibility of appellants to insure inclusion in the record of all trial materials upon which they intend to rely on appeal.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“this discretion is limited by the 'essential demands of fairness.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.