Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 584 F.2d 234 - Sassi v. Breier

Sassi v. Breier’s Empirical Analysis

584 F.2d 234 · 1978

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
5
states following
November 2003
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 7 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently November 2003 · most notably Wood v. Worachek (1980), Wudtke v. Davel (1997)

16 federal appellate · 7 district · 5 state decisions

2201978198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Chambers v. Maroney · Varlack v. SWC Caribbean, Inc. · Craig v. United States · Sassi v. Breier

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whenever the claim or defense asserted in the amended pleading arose out of the conduct, transaction, or occurrence set forth or attempted to be set forth in the original pleading, the amendment relates back to the date of the original pleading. An amendment changing the party against whom a claim is asserted relates back if the foregoing provision is satisfied and, within the period provided by law for commencing the action against him, the party to be brought in by amendment (1) has received such notice of the institution of the action that he will not be prejudiced in maintaining his defense on the merits, and (2) knew or should have known that, but for a mistake concerning the identity of the proper party, the action would have been brought against him.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “to hold otherwise could have an unwarranted impact upon the salutary purposes of statutes of limitations.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.