International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America, UAW v. Marshall’s Empirical Analysis
584 F.2d 390 · 1978
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 90 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably Rettig v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. (1984), United Glass & Ceramic Workers of North America v. Marshall (1978)
10 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Skidmore v. Swift & Co. · Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation · Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 90 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) that a significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated, (2) that sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision have decreased absolutely, and (3) that increases of imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles produced by such workers’ firm or an appropriate subdivision thereof contributed importantly to such total or partial separation, or threat thereof, and to such decline in sales or production. For purposes of paragraph (3), the term “contributed importantly” means a cause which is important, but not necessarily more important than any other cause.”
14 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“an establishment in a multi-establishment firm which produces the domestic articles in question or a distinct part or section of an establishment (whether or not the firm has more than one establishment) where the articles are produced. The term appropriate subdivision includes auxiliary facilities operated in conjunction with (whether or not physically separate from) production facilities.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“It is the Secretary's function to choose a subdivision that best effectuates the purposes of the Trade Act in light of the circumstances of the individual case.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.