Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 584 F.2d 702 - Humphries v. Wainwright

Humphries v. Wainwright’s Empirical Analysis

584 F.2d 702 · 1978

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 2010
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently November 2010

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

4019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ashe v. Swenson · United States v. Scott · Crist v. Bretz · Sanabria v. United States · Lustig v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under the common law involuntary manslaughter was defined as the unintentional killing of another by a person engaged at the time in doing an unlawful act not amounting to a felony and not likely to endanger life, or doing a lawful act in an unlawful manner. .. . In this State — as in many others — the Legislature has defined involuntary manslaughter. Our statutes define it as (1) the killing of a human being by the act, procurement or culpable negligence of another in cases where such killing shall not be justifiable or excusable homicide or murder, section 782.07, F.S.A.; or (2) the death of a human being caused by the operation of a motor vehicle by any person while intoxicated. Section 860.01, F.S.A. [now section 316.1931].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.