Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 584 F.3d 13 - Seng v. Holder

Seng v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis

584 F.3d 13 · 2009

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
December 2024
most recently cited

27 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably Mendez-Barrera v. Holder (2010), Jianli Chen v. Holder (2012)

27 federal appellate ·

340200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Aguilar-Solis v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Laurent v. Ashcroft · Pan v. Gonzales

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “must demonstrate either past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution 'on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “accepting the agency's factfinding unless the evidence 'would compel a reasonable factfinder to reach a contrary conclusion.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Should the IJ reasonably determine that the alien's testimony is not credible, he may disregard it in whole or in part.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.