Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

584 F. App'x 140

Benisek v. Mack

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided October 7, 2014

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2014-10-07

Cited by 3 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2018

1 district ·

Relies on 11 F. Supp. 3d 516 - Benisek v. Mack

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2014-10-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶3O. John Benisek, Stephen Shapiro, and Maria Pycha appeal the district court’s *141order dismissing a civil complaint challenging, on several grounds, Maryland’s congressional districting plan enacted by the state legislature in 2011. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Benisek v. Mack, No. 1:13-cv-03233-JKB, 11 F.Supp.3d 516 (D.Md. Apr. 8, 2014). We deny Shapiro’s motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶4AFFIRMED.

/584/fappx/140 · .json · Public domain