Sandy Routt v. amazon.com’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1125 (§ 43 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. · Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. · Fonovisa, Inc. v. Cherry Auction, Inc. · Hard Rock Cafe Licensing Corporation v. Concession Services Incorporated Hard Rock Cafe Licensing Corporation · Perfect 10, Inc. v. Visa International Service, Ass'n
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A defendant has control over a third party's infringing conduct when the defendant can directly put an end to that conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.