Linscome v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently August 2024
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Varcoe v. Lee · Stoner v. State · Frazier v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“First, the matter must be one of common knowledge (although it does not have to be universally known); second, the matter must be settled beyond a doubt if there is any uncertainty about the matter then evidence must be taken; and third, the knowledge must exist within the jurisdiction of the court.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Berget v. State · MILLS v. STATE“[N]o matter that has been put in issue by the pleadings can be considered undisputed for purposes of judicial notice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. MILLS v. STATE“a suspended sentence cannot be revoked solely on the basis of a subsequent conviction which has not become final.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Woodard v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.