Concannon v. Hampton’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently May 2020
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Rubbelke v. Aebli · Producers Grain Corporation v. Carroll · 28 Ill. App. 3d 926 - Carlson v. Prestige Casualty Co. · Brown v. Stroeter · Sautbine v. Jones
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Authentication may be defined as the act of giving legal authority to a written instrument or a certified copy thereof, so as to render it legally admissible into evidence. . . . Authentication is evidentiary, not jurisdictional.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The purpose of the address requirements is to insure defendant will be informed of the proceeding.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“waived any objections to the lack of authentication[.]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.