Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 584 P2D 814 - Swan v. Lamb

Swan v. Lamb’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
3
states following
February 2020
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently February 2020

11 state decisions

50197819801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 72 Wash. 2d 73 - Pederson v. Dumouchel · Kronke v. Danielson · 10 Utah 2d 40 - Marsh v. Pemberton · Naccarato v. Grob · Baird v. National Health Foundation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “but a specialized application of the standard of conduct so universally imposed by the law: of requiring the degree of care which the ordinary, reasonable and prudent person would observe under the same or similar circumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.