Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

584 So. 2d 1129

Docket No. 91-1762.

Hanor v. Hinckley

George Richard HANOR, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Harry G. HINCKLEY, Jr., Circuit Judge of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in and for Broward County, Florida, Respondent.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 28, 1991.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1991-08-28

Relies on Taylor v. Taylor · 558 So. 2d 532 - Murphy v. Murphy

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1991-08-28

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 2016

8 state decisions

40199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Hugh T. Maloney, Patterson, Maloney & Gardiner, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.

¶2No appearance for respondent.

¶3Dale R. Sanders, Lyons and Sanders, Chartered, Fort Lauderdale, for wife.

¶4*1130 DOWNEY, Judge.

¶5By petition for writ of mandamus George Richard Hanor seeks to require The Honorable Harry G. Hinckley, Jr., Circuit Judge, to hear all matters in this case without referral to a master unless consented to by all of the parties.

¶6It appears that the trial judge referred several aspects of the case, i.e., temporary alimony and attorney's fees, to a master over the objection of Hanor. Reference under those circumstances is prohibited by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.490(c). Taylor v. Taylor,569 So.2d 1389 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Murphy v. Murphy,558 So.2d 532 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

¶7Accordingly, the writ shall issue. Pursuant thereto, the trial court shall vacate the order of reference and proceed in conformity with this opinion.

¶8DELL and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

/584/so2d/1129 · .json · Public domain