State v. Reisner’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 536 So. 2d 240 - In re Florida Bar · 542 So. 2d 1330 - In re Amendment to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191 · 382 So. 2d 697 - State v. Bender · 517 So. 2d 799 - State v. Rowell · Gillman v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“I. ARE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE RULES 10D-42.023 [1] and 10D-42.024 [2] [AS THEY EXISTED PRIOR TO AUGUST 1, 1991] VOID FOR VAGUENESS, AND IF SO, DOES THIS PRECLUDE THE STATE'S USE OF BREATH TESTING RESULTS IN A CRIMINAL TRIAL? II. DO THE CURRENT METHODS OF HRS'S MONTHLY AND YEARLY MAINTENANCE ACCURACY CHECKS COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 316.1932(1)(f)1, FLORIDA STATUTES, [3] AND IF NOT, DOES THIS PRECLUDE THE STATE'S USE OF BREATH TESTING RESULTS IN A CRIMINAL TRIAL? III. MAY THE DEFENDANT RAISE THESE ISSUES IN THE CONTEXT OF A CRIMINAL PROSECUTION IN THE COUNTY COURT?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“produced no expert to explain that any deviation in the procedure used by the two forms was insubstantial or unimportant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.