Lozano v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently June 2019
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Irvin v. Dowd · Hernandez v. New York · Sheppard v. Maxwell · Estelle v. Williams · Estes v. Texas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Surely, the fear that one's own county would respond to a not guilty verdict by erupting into violence is as highly "impermissible [a] factor" as can be contemplated. Surely too, there was an overwhelmingly "unacceptable risk" of its having adversely affected Lozano's-and every citizen's-most basic right under our system: the one to a fair determination of his guilt or innocence based on the evidence alone.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The victim's character becomes relevant to resolve an issue as to the reasonableness of the defendant's fear at the time of the incident.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“on the basis of the conditions existing at the time of any such motion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.